|
Myth of the Vanishing Working Class
It seems to be fashionable in the anarchist/anti-authoritarian milieu to downplay, if not ignore
altogether, the importance of the working class as an agent of revolutionary change. The belief
seems to be widespread that the working class in the de-industrializing first world is disappearing,
and therefore that anarchists need to look for other "constituencies" with identities other than
class to aim our propaganda at.
Well, just to test out this thesis, I checked some statistics gathered by the U.S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics (BLS). Looking at the year 1991, the BLS reports some 116,877,000 employed people
in the U.S. Of these, around 62.65 percent, or some 73,227,000 people, were employed as production
or non-supervisory workers in private industry. Of these 73,227,000 workers, 22.56 percent (or
16,527,000 people) were working in the goods-producing industries (i.e., mining, construction and
manufacturing); 77.43 percent (or 56,700,000) were employed in the service-producing industries
(i.e., transportation and public utilities, wholesale and retail trade, financial, insurance and
real estate, and other services).
Clearly the service-producing industries employ the majority of workers, but it is also clear
that the goods-producing sector still employs millions of human beings. Besides, only a vulgar
Marxist, or an anarchist who hasn't got the foggiest notion of what class means, would claim that
the workers in the service industries are not part and parcel of the working class.
Anarcho-syndicalists have always maintained that workers of both hand and brain need to organize,
not only to overthrow capitalism but to re-organize the economy to feed, house, clothe, educate,
entertain, care for the sick and do all those things than hold society together.
Of course, the mere existence of the working class does not say anything about its revolutionary
potential, but for anarchists to neglect the task of spreading our ideas within the working class is
sheer suicide. It is no secret that the anarchist movement historically has only achieved any
societal impact to the extent that its ideas penetrated the working class and influenced its
organization. While it is clear that workers are capable of achieving a revolutionary consciousness
without the aid of a "vanguard," it is also clear that this inchoate revolutionary consciousness is
influenced by the propaganda of revolutionary or reactionary minorities. In Russia Leninism gained
the upper hand; in Italy it was Fascism; in Spain, Anarchosyndicalism. In the U.S. at this time, the
ideology of racial nationalism (both white and black), leading to race war, has a better chance of
influencing the working class than does anarchism--primarily because the
anarchist/anti-authoritarian milieu refuses to engage in any kind of working-class agitation or
organizing, preferring, instead, to retreat into a cozy counter-cultural ghetto.
If anarchists want to truly change this society we have to get back into the working class. There
are no other alternatives.
--Mike Hargis
|